Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
J Travel Med ; 5(4): 167-72, 1998 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9876189

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Inactivated hepatitis A vaccines are licensed with a vaccination schedule based on two injections of vaccine given at least 6 months apart. METHODS: Two vaccination schedules for the inactivated hepatitis A vaccine, AvaximTM (Pasteur Mérieux Connaught, Lyon, France), were compared in a monocentric, randomized, open trial. Two doses of the vaccine were given at intervals of either 6 months (0-6 month group) or 12 months (0-12 month group) to 96 adult volunteers. Anti-hepatitis A virus (HAV) antibody titers were determined in a blind fashion using the modified RIA (mRIA) HAVABtrade mark assay. After excluding subjects with positive preimmunization anti-HAV titers and those with protocol deviations, both groups were still comparable by sex ratio and mean age. RESULTS: Four weeks (28 6 4 days) after the first dose, the seroconversion (SC) rate of initially HAV-seronegative subjects (antibody titer < 20 mIU/mL) was 100% in the 0-6 month group and 96. 9% in the 0-12 month group, with corresponding geometric mean titer (GMT) values (95% CI) of 369 mIU/mL (274-497 mIU/mL) and 445 mIU/mL (292-679 mIU/mL), respectively. After 6 months, SC was obtained in all subjects, and the corresponding GMT values were 349 mIU/mL and 359 mIU/mL in the 0-6 month group and the 0-12 month group, respectively. Four weeks after the booster dose given at 6 months, a 14.5-fold rise in GMT was observed. In the 0-12 month group, anti-HAV GMT values decreased by only 20% from 6 months to 12 months with a pre-booster GMT value of 286 mIU/mL at the 12-month evaluation. Four weeks after the booster given at 12 months, a 22. 5-fold rise in GMT was observed. Statistical analysis showed that the two vaccination schedules were comparable in their ability to boost antibody titers. Unsolicited reactions to vaccination were not different to those reported during earlier trials. Less than 12% of the vaccinees reported reactions after the first dose (11/93), or after the booster dose (11/92). CONCLUSIONS: This trial demonstrated antibody persistence is excellent for at least 12 months after one dose of this vaccine, and that a booster may be given at any time between 6 and 12 months after primary immunization.


Assuntos
Hepatite A/imunologia , Hepatite A/prevenção & controle , Esquemas de Imunização , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/administração & dosagem , Vacinas de Produtos Inativados/sangue , Vacinas contra Hepatite Viral/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Hepatite Viral/sangue , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Vacinas contra Hepatite A , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valores de Referência
4.
Acta cient. venez ; 42(6): 345-51, 1991. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS | ID: lil-105918

RESUMO

Se elaboraron dos vacunas experimentales (Vac-19 y Vac-28) de Hepatitis a Cuerpo de Inclusión (HCI) a partir de los serotipos 4,10 y 11, aislados en brotes de campo en el país. Las cepas se atenuaron por pasajes en huevos embrionados SPF (16 y 22 pasajes para ambas vacunas) y cultivo de células renales (3 y 6 pasajes respectivamente). Se utilizaron cuatro grupos (G) experimentales: G I y G II formado por 8 pollos cada uno, vacunados vía oral (4,4 DICC55/ml) con Vac-19 y Vac-28 respectivamente a la tercera semana y revacunados a los 35 días por igual vía y dosis. Los grupos G III y G IV con 5 pollos cada uno correspondieron a control positivo y negativo, ambos grupos sin vacunar, el primero solo desafiado con un pool de los serotipos 4,10 y 11, a los 45 días de edad y el último sin desafiar. Exámenes clínicos serológicos se realizaron previo y posterior a las vacunaciones y desafío. La respuesta inmune se midió, a través de Inmunodifusión en Gelosa (IDG) y Seroneutralización (SN) en Cultivo de Células Renales (CCR) por el método ß (200 DICC50/50*l). Mediante la prueba IDG se observaron reacciones positivas (100%) desde el día 43 en adelante en los grupos cavunados y desde el 55 en el grupo desafiado (GIII). Los Títulos Medios Geométricos (TMG) previo al desafío fueron G I de 1.194 y en G II 23.525. Con posterioridad al desafío se observó un TMG de 7.760 y . 305.736 respectivamente en ambos grupos. El G III tuvo un TMG de 640. No se observó signología clínica y mortalidad el desarrollo de la experiencia. Se concluye que solo Vac-28 originó protección a las aves, emdida por la respuesta inmune humoral, pero por las lesiones observadas en el grupo solo vacunado se debería continuar estudiando sucompleta atenuación


Assuntos
Animais , Infecções por Adenoviridae/veterinária , Aviadenovirus/isolamento & purificação , Hepatite Viral Animal/microbiologia , Vacinas contra Hepatite Viral/sangue , Infecções por Adenoviridae/microbiologia , Infecções por Adenoviridae/patologia , Aviadenovirus/sangue , Galinhas , Hepatite Viral Animal/patologia , Corpos de Inclusão Viral , Rim/patologia , Sorotipagem , Fatores de Tempo , Titulometria
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...